« Wake me up in 2009 | Main | What does Geoff Hoon do all day? »

January 26, 2006

Listen to what the man said

What's this? Some actual evidence? A balanced, informed view about the difference between FPTP politics and MMP politics? Bonus.

"Graham Kelly, a former MP and New Zealand's High Commissioner to Canada ­who has seen both systems up close­ explains how it perfomed in his country."

As they say: read it in full.

As they don't, gist:

Better Things: there is "better legislation under PR"; the voters are more involved; MPs work harder for their constituencies; the cabinet no longer has effective authoritarian power; greater representation of women, minorities etc; small parties make big parties more honest

Indifferent things: early on, the smaller parties tried to exert disproportionate influence, but the voters punished them for it later; turnout has fallen, but why this is so can't be determined; transparency hasn't increased; MPs are still immature idiots; voters who voted for the winning party are annoyed that they don't have almighty power

Badder things: a bit more complicated (still not total public understanding even after almost a decade); less confidentiality, as smaller parties often leak what's going on in order to appear to be making a difference

Posted by pauldavies on January 26, 2006

Comments

We're democrats and believe in free speech, but we're also committed to civil and rational debate. We reserve the right to delete material posted to our site, but we hope and expect to exercise this right rarely if at all.